Pursuing Cardiology As a Medical Student/Resident

As an Early Career blogger for the AHA, I wanted to write my final blog post on advice for those interested in pursuing cardiology. My interest in cardiology began during my first year of medical school, and now as I am applying to become a fellow, I wanted to look back at the last 7 years.


Medical school

As a medical student, it can be difficult to know what field you would like to pursue. Although some may know from the beginning what they would like to specialize in, the majority of students must use their time during their clinical years to explore different fields. Given this, I would advise students to focus on getting a good background in all aspects of medicine during medical school. Take as much in from your exposure to each field. Do well on your boards, take ownership of the patients you see and read as much as you can.

So as a first or second year how can you know if cardiology is a field you should consider? Well, what made me interested in the field during those years was the physiology behind the mechanics of the heart.  It made intuitive sense. The time I spent reading Lilly’s Pathophysiology of Heart Disease did not feel like studying. This inspired me to sign up for electives in cardiology later on in medical school. During third and fourth year, rotating on a cardiology consult service or a CCU service can help you see the day to day life of cardiologist. It exposes you to the common consults and admissions in the field. It also allows you to get to know the type of personalities in cardiology. If you are interested, get involved in research projects.


Internal Medicine Residency

In the beginning of my residency, my advisor told me that before one could become a great cardiologist, they must become a great internist. This is something that I heard echoed by cardiology program directors during this past year’s AHA Scientific Sessions. A passion for patient care and an understanding of the intricacies of internal medicine are paramount in the path of a future cardiology fellow.

Be a good citizen in your program. Complete all your administrative duties on time. Be the one that chiefs can rely on when scheduling difficulties occur. Residency is not just about being smart but being reliable and hardworking. This makes you stand out.

While on the wards, incorporate the use of ultrasound in your daily practice. Try and volunteer for procedure and make it a goal to become comfortable with central and arterial lines.

Depending on your interests in cardiology, as a medicine resident it is worthwhile to get involved in a research project. It is important to truly have a passion for the research topic you decide to study. Whether it is because a patient you saw was affected by what you are researching, or if you have background in that topic, it is important to have a connection with the research topic. This is what drives you to spend your time outside of the hospital working on the research project. Attempting to work on a project in the name of “just having research” is a recipe for burnout and you will likely not complete the project.

Show case your research either through presentations at the AHA Scientific Sessions poster session or the American College of Cardiology meeting. Recognize that the deadline for abstract submission for these conferences are months before the meeting. Besides presenting, networking and sitting in on lectures important topics in cardiology. It is inspiring and will further your aspiration to work hard.

Finally, make sure to begin working on your application, specifically the personal statement early.


What was your experience applying to cardiology?



The Art of Medicine

The Senior Capstone presentation is considered a milestone for third year internal medicine residents at Emory.  Residents have wide latitude in choosing a topic and are encouraged to delve into the literature in an area related to their career interests.  Some of my co-residents pursuing cardiology have discussed advancements in LVAD technology, reviewed seminal trials for PCI, and explored data behind the DASH diet.  I wanted to stray from the beaten path and wade into the medical humanities.

Here’s how my presentation begins:


Slide 1. My talk today is called medical archaeology: the art of diagnosis and the diagnosis of art.  My goal is to spend some time at the intersection of medicine, art, and history, and see what lessons we can learn about making observations and deciphering a diagnosis.



Slide 2. A couple years ago, the University of Pennsylvania started teaching their medical students how to study paintings.  The goal was to practice observing and describing the human form, skills that are fundamental to any astute clinician.  Last year, they published a randomized controlled trial. Here’s how it worked:

During their ophthalmology block, half the students went to the Philadelphia Museum of Art to get taught by professional art instructors.  Afterwards, they were tested on their ability to describe three types of images: paintings, retinal images, and clinical photos.  Students in the intervention arm scored significantly better in each of these categories compared to the control arm.

It turns out they’re not the only ones doing this.  Yale published a similar randomized controlled trial in JAMA back in 2001. Meanwhile, Harvard has been sending its dermatology residents to the Boston Museum of Fine Arts. We don’t have time today for a field trip to the High Museum, but what we can do is take a virtual tour of art and history as it relates to medicine.

Midway through my talk is an interesting example about an ancient drug we still use in modern cardiology.



Slide 3. Over the centuries, often by accident, paintings have captured clues that might be relevant to trained medical eye.  Sometimes, the striking thing about a painting is not what’s portrayed, but how it’s portrayed–the style and technique.  Here, we’re going to use art to give us clues about its creator.

Our next artist was a Dutch painter who was known around town as the “redheaded madman.” In letters to his brother, Van Gogh complained of chronic abdominal pain, hallucinations, and insomnia.  He was hospitalized multiple times for episodes of insanity.  During one of these spells, he famously cut off his ear.  Doctors at the time diagnosed him with epilepsy.

At the age of 37, Van Gogh died of suicide–shot himself in the chest. Since his death, the scientific literature on Van Gogh has become as prolific as the artist himself. And while doctors back then called it epilepsy, doctors of the modern era have expanded the differential. A 1947 paper was the first to propose bipolar disorder, pointing out descriptions of manic and depressive episodes. A JAMA manuscript from 1990 argued for Meniere’s disease, suggesting tinnitus drove Van Gogh to perform surgery on his own ear. According to a 1991 article in the BMJ, Van Gogh may have had acute intermittent porphyria, a disorder involving heme synthesis which causes attacks of abdominal pain and psychiatric symptoms.



Slide 4. But the most well-known theory comes from examining Van Gogh’s artwork itself.  In fact, many of you probably use Van Gogh’s artistic style as a mnemonic to help you remember signs of digoxin toxicity.  In his later years, as his health got worse, Van Gogh’s color palate turned intensely yellow, suggesting he may have developed xanthopsia or yellow vision.



Slide 5. The swirling halos in pieces like Starry Night or Night Café are also big clues.  Digoxin is known to cause blurry outlines, a type of halo vision.  Recall that GI side effects are also common, consistent with his chronic nausea and abdominal pain.



Slide 6. If you’re a real trivia buff, you might know that digitalis was originally extract from the Fox Glove plant.  This plant was widely used during the 19th century not just for cardiac problems, but also for various neurologic and psychiatric ailments.  So it’s likely that Van Gogh’s doctors gave him Fox Glove to treat his epilepsy.  In fact, on two separate occasions, Van Gogh painted his personal doctor posing with Fox Glove.  Once again, the proof is in the painting.



  1. Gurwin J, et al. A randomized controlled study of art observation training to improve medical student ophthalmology skills. Ophthalmology. 2018;125:8–14.
  2. Huang JT, et al. Fine arts training improves observational skills of dermatology trainees: a pilot study. Br J Dermatol. 2016;175:815–817.
  3. Dolev JC, et al. Use of fine art to enhance visual diagnostic skills. JAMA. 2001;286:1020–1021.
  4. Perry I. Vincent van Gogh’s illness: a case record. Bulletin of the History of Medicine. 1947;21:146-72.
  5. Blumer D. The Illness of Vincent van Gogh. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159(4):519–526.
  6. Arenberg IK, et al. Van Gogh had Ménière’s disease and not epilepsy. JAMA. 1990;264(4):491-493.
  7. Loftus LS, et al. Vincent van Gogh’s illness: acute intermittent porphyria. BMJ. 1991;303:1589–1591.
  8. Lee TC. Van Gogh’s vision digitalis intoxication. JAMA. 1981;245:728–9.